On 04/19/2013 09:10 AM, Eric Bénard wrote:
Hi Daiane,
Le Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:23:27 -0300,
Daiane Angolini <[email protected]> a écrit :
On 04/18/2013 04:58 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Daiane Angolini
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 04/18/2013 03:59 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Provides a new linux-fslc.inc file which abstracts the specific
changes for the linux-fslc based kernels. A new variable has been add
to linux-imx.inc to allow to skip the 'imx-test' specific hacks after
kernel install as 'imx-test' is not supported for Linux mainline.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <[email protected]>
---
I understand what you did, but it's not yet a common place for both kernel
recipes.
If it is needed for *any* kernel, poky is wrong in not providing this for
*any* kernel.
Usually kernel would do the right thing but not in our case. Some
entry point are even not in the kernel code from FSL branch.
I would accept this argument if we only faced this problem with FSL kernel.
But, as we faced exactly the same with kernel mainline, I can't accept that.
If kernel mainline is wrong, we must fix it.
when compiling manually a mainline kernel out of OE, you may have to do
the same thing if the .config includes several platforms which have a
different LOADADDR (example : i.MX51 where RAM is at 0x90000000 and
i.MX53 where it is at 0x70000000). That's not a bug that's the
consequence of having different architectures enabled at the same time
in the same defconfig.
Which only ensure that FSL kernel is not wrong the same way mainline is
not wrong.
--
Daiane
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
