> -----Original Message----- > From: Hart, Darren > Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 1:55 PM > To: Kamble, Nitin A; [email protected]; Zanussi, Tom; > [email protected]; Burton, Ross > Subject: Re: [Patch v2 6/7] core-image-minimal-initramfs: extend to support > early microcode loading > > On 7/11/14, 11:59, "Kamble, Nitin A" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >From: Nitin A Kamble <[email protected]> > > > >Consumes the intel-earlyload-microcode-image to generate an initrd > >which is extended with the earlyload microcode support. > > > >This recipe now generates this additional initrd image: > > core-image-minimal-initramfs-${MACHINE}.cpio.gz.ucode > > > >Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <[email protected]> > >--- > > common/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bbappend | 3 > >+++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 > >common/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bbappend > > > >diff --git > >a/common/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bbappend > >b/common/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bbappend > >new file mode 100644 > >index 0000000..d836400 > >--- /dev/null > >+++ b/common/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal- > initramfs.bbappend > >@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ > >+inherit image-ucode > >+ > >+IMAGE_FSTYPES_meta-intel = "cpio.gz.ucode" > >-- > >1.8.1.4 > > > > > Hrm.... A meta-intel override... Do we need to introduce a layer override, > or would the intel-common overrides be sufficient? It would reduce the > complexity a bit. > I have renamed the override to intel-common now.
Nitin > I do see the value in the layer override though as it applies to the BSPs > that are not yet intel-common - or won't ever be. > > So.. > > Acked-by: Darren Hart <[email protected]> > > > -- > Darren Hart Open Source Technology > Center > [email protected] Intel Corporation > -- _______________________________________________ meta-intel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
