> -----Original Message----- > From: Hart, Darren > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 11:00 AM > To: Kamble, Nitin A; [email protected]; Zanussi, Tom; > [email protected]; Burton, Ross > Subject: Re: [Patch v2 6/7] core-image-minimal-initramfs: extend to support > early microcode loading > > On 7/17/14, 15:27, "Kamble, Nitin A" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >+IMAGE_FSTYPES_meta-intel = "cpio.gz.ucode" > >> >-- > >> >1.8.1.4 > >> > > >> > >> > >> Hrm.... A meta-intel override... Do we need to introduce a layer > >>override, or would the intel-common overrides be sufficient? It would > >>reduce the complexity a bit. > >> > >I have renamed the override to intel-common now. > > Well, what about the comment below? > > > > >Nitin > > > >> I do see the value in the layer override though as it applies to the > >>BSPs that are not yet intel-common - or won't ever be. I am not clear what is the concern here.
> > If you use the intel common overrides, then machines that don't share a > common kernel cannot have microcode support? That seems overly > restrictive to me. I don't see this restricting it in anyway. People who want to use custom kernel will need to ensure they have early microcode driver enabled in the kernel. Nitin > > >> > >> So.. > >> > >> Acked-by: Darren Hart <[email protected]> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Darren Hart Open Source Technology > >> Center > >> [email protected] Intel > Corporation > >> > > > > > > > -- > Darren Hart Open Source Technology > Center > [email protected] Intel Corporation > -- _______________________________________________ meta-intel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
