Eric Wong <e...@80x24.org> wrote: > Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstan...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 07:29:05PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > > > I did a few successful tests on small trial lists, but I'm running > > > > into a > > > > problem when I try to actually edit something in (a copy of) LKML: > > > > > > > > $ perl5lib/bin/public-inbox-edit -m messageid /mnt/fastio/lkml > > > > (mutt opens here) > > > > 1 kept, 0 deleted. > > > > Exception: Expected block 102325 to be level 2, not 0 > > > > > > That's an exception from Xapian I haven't seen that in years. > > > Which version of Xapian and are you using chert or glass? > > > > EL7 has 1.2.25.
Also, is that the Search::Xapian version or the xapian-core-libs/libxapianXX version? It's OK if they mismatch, Search::Xapian (XS bindings) can work with libxapianXX for 1.4.x, even. Mainly it's the libxapianXX version which matters. > Oh, I just realized that doesn't use OFD locks at all because > its Linux 3.10 and OFD locks appeared in 3.15 (unless RH backported). Yes, it appears RH backported OFD locks to 3.10; so more variables to consider... Just wondering, do t/edit.t and t/replace.t tests pass for you? -- unsubscribe: meta+unsubscr...@public-inbox.org archive: https://public-inbox.org/meta/
