Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstan...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Eric:
> 
> The new x-lore systems are rebuilt and reindexed using the latest master (as
> of 2 days ago), but boosts still don't appear to be quite working as intended.
> For example, this thread:
> 
> https://x-lore.kernel.org/all/20210809175620.720923-1-ltyker...@gmail.com/
> 
> It was sent to io...@lists.linux-foundation.org (mailman) and to a bunch of
> vger lists, all of which have higher boosts in the configuration, e.g. netdev:

boost doesn't come into effect due to the Mailman footer from
the iommu list.  extindex and v2 both account for content
differences despite sharing the same Message-ID
(deduplicating purely on Message-ID would be open to abuse
 (and many old MUA-side bugs))

>       [publicinbox "linux-iommu"]
>         address = io...@lists.linux-foundation.org
>         url = https://x-lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/
>         inboxdir = /srv/public-inbox/lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu
>         indexlevel = full
>         newsgroup = org.linux-foundation.lists.iommu
>         infourl = https://www.kernel.org/lore.html
>         boost = 1
>         listid = iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org
>       [publicinbox "netdev"]
>         address = net...@vger.kernel.org
>         url = https://x-lore.kernel.org/netdev/
>         inboxdir = /srv/public-inbox/lore.kernel.org/netdev
>         indexlevel = full
>         newsgroup = org.kernel.vger.netdev
>         infourl = https://www.kernel.org/lore.html
>         boost = 10
>         listid = netdev.vger.kernel.org

> When retrieving mbox.gz, we get the contents as archived by the iommu list,
> though theoretically we should get one of the higher-boosted lists instead.
> Anything I can help troubleshoot?

I'm seeing both the iommu and LKML List-IDs (which is intended
behavior due to aforementioned Mailman footer)
 https://x-lore.kernel.org/all/20210809175620.720923-1-ltyker...@gmail.com/raw
and also
 
https://x-lore.kernel.org/all/20210809175620.720923-1-ltyker...@gmail.com/t.mbox.gz

Is LKML boosted more than netdev?  (If so, then it's working as
expected, since the footer-less vger versions should be considered
identical).

I'm planning on having a "diff view" to more easily distinguish
between different messages having the same Message-ID.  It would
make it easier to highlight buggy clients, Mailman misconfigurations,
and malicious attempts to obscure/confuse readers.
--
unsubscribe: one-click, see List-Unsubscribe header
archive: https://public-inbox.org/meta/

Reply via email to