Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstan...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 10:46:57PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > > I can't do +E because that's not available to me under CentOS7 (I can't > > > wait > > > until we move on, but just when we think the yak is fully shaved, we find > > > more > > > clumps of thick fur we hadn't considered). Is the output of the regular > > > "lsof > > > -p" helpful at all? > > > > Sure. > > Sent privately.
My, that's a lot of pipes... I should've told you to try this debug patch earlier, but this might help... (and our test suite should really be able to watch messages like this while capturing) diff --git a/t/cindex.t b/t/cindex.t index 60711492..e582acbf 100644 --- a/t/cindex.t +++ b/t/cindex.t @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ EOM my $cmd = [ qw(-cindex -u --all --associate -d), "$tmp/ext", '-I', $basic->{inboxdir} ]; $cidx_out = $cidx_err = ''; - ok(run_script($cmd, $env, $opt), 'associate w/o search'); + ok(run_script($cmd, $env, undef), 'associate w/o search'); like($cidx_err, qr/W: \Q$basic->{inboxdir}\E not indexed for search/, 'non-Xapian-enabled inbox noted'); } The like() test will fail with the above change, of course; but maybe something else is amiss on your system and showing stderr will help. FWIW, I can't reproduce the problem on my CentOS7 VM.