On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Sivakatirswami wrote:
> on 7/17/00 11:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> What are criteria/issues are involved in making a decision to set this to
> >> true or to use the Metacard File selector?
> >
> > The only reason I can think of for using the stack version of the File
> > Selector would be if you'd modified it (e.g., to show a preview of a
> > selected file or something).
>
> OK good, then, when coping resources to a stack before building a
> standalone, if one sets the systemFileSelector to true, we assume we DO NOT
> need to include the FileSelector as a resource. Correct?
Yes, unless you're building a version for a UNIX platform: Those don't
have a system file selector and so must use MetaCard's stack-based
implementation.
Regards,
Scott
********************************************************
Scott Raney [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.metacard.com
MetaCard: You know, there's an easier way to do that...
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.
