Geoff Canyon wrote:
>
> Scott Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said, on 8/4/00 6:14 PM:
>
> >If your goal is to create a new standard for page description, then maybe
> >you have a reachable (and laudible) goal, but for current HTML, I would
> >suggest taking a step back and evaluating if you really have that kind of
> >time available.
>
> I agree. Limited compatibility with existing pages is fine, but if this
> quixotic quest has any chance (let's face it--against Microsoft, a
> snowball has a better chance in...) then the focus has to be on
> downloadable stacks/scripts as "pages."
Perhaps would it be reachable to apply the MC browser concept to applications
service providing projects...
> I can see it now--little badges everywhere on the web saying "This site
> best viewed in MetaCard!" This morning, www.warnerbros.com said I had to
> have Netscape or Internet Explorer, _and_ Flash, in order to use their
> site at _all_ What a thrill it would be to have some major site do a
> slight twist on that, and tell me that I needed the free MetaCard viewer
> to access their site...sorry, I was daydreaming for a moment there...
>
> gc, who still thinks this idea could be great fun...
Pierre Sahores
WEB, DB, B2B & ASP design.
There are countries where people
have six fingers because they
don't know the metric system.
Sir Jean Yanne
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.
