> In the example you give, I would bet the "repeat with" is faster, since it it's my actual code, i used to use the "repeat for" but switched that chunk to the "repeat with" as it seemed to be easier to just replace all of the instances at once...
> It probably depends on the size of what's being converted that's the unknown variable.. i don't assume too many people write 10,000 word essays for email messages (well, i do know one lady who does, but she's cool ;-) > Just my thoughts without benchmarking it... thanks for sharing, but you can have them back now (they're getting soggy down here in the gutter =)~ _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
