J. Landman Gay wrote:

After reading all the responses, I'm going to vote for this. It seems to me that public domain is the easiest solution, doesn't require any special handling, allows anyone to do anything without legal entanglments, and is just generally easier to manage. So I vote for public domain.

Public Domain (MIT licence) is a good option. Ian Gordon has suggested ways of encouraging people to contibute code back to the main fork if they download form the 'official' site - which seems promising.



The only concern about PD I have is that it is just that: public domain. Anyone can take what we have and do whatever they want with it, including marketing it commercially. In other words, PD may be too a broad license. Do we care?


Robert Brenstein
_______________________________________________
metacard mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard

Reply via email to