Richard, > Once we confirm the IDs of the splitter cursors in Rev, > should we update MC's to match those? I'm inclined to say > yes to be done with it, even if the numbers are oddly out of > sequence. Objections?
I see no objections as cursors are usually called or referred to by name. Dont forget the variable watcher splitters... cheers Xavier _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list metacard@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
