On 6/19/05 2:09 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
To minimize potential conflicts with the engine going forward we may
want to use the same IDs Rev uses for the splitter cursors, which are
1031 for horizontal splitter and 201582 for vertical splitter. But
those numbers are so out of sequence they seem strange -- any of you
have a moment to double-check those?
Once we confirm the IDs of the splitter cursors in Rev, should we update
MC's to match those? I'm inclined to say yes to be done with it, even
if the numbers are oddly out of sequence. Objections?
If I understand it right, the old splitter IDs are now used for other
things, so I don't see any harm in updating the splitters to the new
IDs. This change is going to break my old stacks regardless. It will
break the Variable Watcher too, right?
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
_______________________________________________
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
