Now that I have Revolution up and running and Metacard 2.7 up and running I thought I'd open my biggest fully finished project and see how it fared with both.

With all the new additions to Revolution since my version, I thought I'd work in Revolution for a little while to help me learn what new goodies existed. So I opened the existing, finished, happy stack in Revolution.

The goal was to create a UB standalone from an existing stack.

The stack opens. But the Revolution IDE does not like that I have standard stacks installed in the stack. (For ease of Standalone building, a long time ago I installed custom versions of Ask, Answer, Message etc. in the stack so that I would not have to import them every time I built a standalone.) The Message box in particular gives it fits. I could not determine whether my password protections were still in place. (The Message Box errors seemed to override most of what I tried to experiment with.)

Overall it was rather confusing, not having a clue how to approach things that are second nature to me. There were so many standalone options, and I could not tell if it recognized any of my presettings, it was very confusing. I assumed that once familiar with it, standalones would be easier to build as there appeared to be more presettings that could be set.

But at this time, too much confusion, so I opened the happy stack in the newly created Metacard 2.7 IDE.

Familiarity returned.  No weird errors regarding things I have pre-installed.

I really was looking forward to working in Revolution itself. But at least for existing, finished projects, it's a good thing I can work in the familiar IDE.

Perhaps I can try working on my new project in Revolution, and work on existing projects in Metacard. The new project should be in the early enough stages not to send it into spasms.

Shari
--
Mac and Windows shareware games
http://www.gypsyware.com
_______________________________________________
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard

Reply via email to