Hi Nicolas On 11 Jun., 04:05, Nicolas Alvarez <[email protected]> wrote:
> But as I have mentioned before, I think metadata is orthogonal to multi-URL > file downloading, and would be best served by a separate spec in a separate > namespace. I agree. But then again I'm cracking my head over logo, license and the bunch of other metadata... Consequently this sort of stuff would better be placed into some RDF/foaf or another xmlns etc. (exploring https://launchpad.net/ , their RDF feeds are really interesting...) Lorenz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metalink Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/metalink-discussion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
