The current plan is to get a final draft this group is happy with and then go outside the Metalink community and ask (with force when necessary) experts in related areas to review the document. That feedback will feed back here and when you are satisfied that all feedback has been addressed, I will help push this document forward as an IETF standard (with a fallback option of Informational status).
It is critical that you, as subject matter experts, put your weight behind this draft and join the public discussion at the IETF as needed to get this through the process. EHL > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:metalink- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Anthony Bryan > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 5:57 PM > To: Metalink Discussion > Subject: ID: Request for lots of community review :) > > > hi everyone, > > it'd be great if you haven't reviewed the Internet Draft yet, if you > could now. I think we are getting VERY close to where we want to be. > > see the version in svn which is most up to date, along with an html > version that may be easier to follow. > > http://metalinks.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/metalinks/internetdraft/ > > one of the final things I'm aware of: > > <type> name > > we need a more descriptive name, like <dynamic> or...any ideas? or > remove it, like Peter suggested. > > -- > (( Anthony Bryan ... Metalink [ http://www.metalinker.org ] > )) Easier, More Reliable, Self Healing Downloads > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metalink Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/metalink-discussion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
