On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Tatsuhiro<[email protected]> wrote: > > The schema snippet in the main section(such as 4.1.1) uses & > connector, while in Appendix B, only , connector is used. > > 4.1.1: > > 462 metalinkMetalink = > 463 element metalink:metalink { > 464 metalinkCommonAttributes, > 465 (metalinkFiles > 466 & metalinkGenerator? > 467 & metalinkOrigin? > 468 & metalinkPublished? > 469 & metalinkType? > 470 & metalinkUpdated? > 471 & extensionElement*), > 472 } > > Appendix B: > 1644 element metalink:metalink { > 1645 element metalink:generator { > 1646 metalinkTextConstruct > 1647 }?, > 1648 element metalink:origin { metalinkUri }?, > 1649 element metalink:type { "static" | "dynamic" }?, > 1650 element metalink:published { metalinkDateConstruct }?, > 1651 element metalink:updated { metalinkDateConstruct }?, > > RELAX NG schema says that & connector and , connector mean differently > (practically it is not a problem I think..), should we have to update > Appendix B according to main section?
thank you. please update Appendix B so it is correct. > I also noticed referencing metalinkCommonAttributes is missing in > Appendix B. Is it intentional or should it be inserted in every > element? unintentional, please fix that as well if possible. -- (( Anthony Bryan ... Metalink [ http://www.metalinker.org ] )) Easier, More Reliable, Self Healing Downloads --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metalink Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/metalink-discussion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
