On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 12:30:04 -0700 (PDT), "'fl' via Metamath" <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't fundamentally disagree with that. Simply I think that if you want > to teach logic with software you have to use natural deduction with a > system... > In short, that's why I think Metamath is not the best educational tool.
I'm not sure that these claims belong on the Wikipedia page about Metamath, though. If there's a scientific study that proves these claims, then cite it! Otherwise, they're simply reasonable opinions. I think we have something of a counter-example: I believe at least one high school student learned logic via Metamath/set.mm, and contributed a number of proofs. I'm beginning to think the whole "Pedagogy" section should just be removed from the Wikipedia page. It's mainly opinion unsupported by any rigorous study. --- David A. Wheeler -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metamath" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/E1hmlLw-0003zM-8O%40rmmprod05.runbox.
