> If there's a scientific study that proves these claims, then cite it! > Otherwise, they're simply reasonable opinions. >
Is it evidence-based? Of course not, it is no evidence-based. I'm not the Food and Drug Administration or NASA. "Evidence-based" has become the argument for killing any conversation in one shot. Let's get back to reality. Let us return to humanism. Correct reasonings on probable truths will suffice. It did the job for 2500 years, it can still do it. This was Leibniz' and Galileo's way of thinking, no less. And when we see what food, ecological and climatic disasters the "scientific" organization of society has led us to, we may have doubts about "evidence-based" things. There is obviously something wrong somewhere. Coca-Cola and Monsanto, the evidence-based things they know how to manage them. Through conflicts of interest, incidentally. -- FL -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metamath" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/99983d21-93f7-485e-8eca-ea0a488b39f0%40googlegroups.com.
