We plan to run it on a broader scale for sure. I will check the two theorems as well today.
Thanks for your suggestions! -stan On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 12:29 AM Benoit <[email protected]> wrote: > I hope you can run OpenAI on more proofs. Looking at some the first > shortenings, it looks like it can behave as a more efficient > "minimize_with" in some cases where there are many "weakenings". For > instance, ~mideulem and ~midexlem use a lot of weakenings in the form of > adantr, adantlr, ad2antrr, simplr, simprl... Could you run OpenAI on these > two theorems to see what it does ? > > Benoît > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Metamath" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/b1bab644-ea9f-49ba-8238-0377228266ab%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/b1bab644-ea9f-49ba-8238-0377228266ab%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metamath" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/CACZd_0w2woyNaQjuk2ES6DoyBvUqNKQosCQa%3Dgi_ngh2%3D2Hbfg%40mail.gmail.com.
