The problem is that the proof uses an old version of frlmgsum: Either 
frlmgsumOLD (deprecated!) must be used in step 85, or step 84 must be 
adapted to comply with the new version of frlmgsum.

Alexander

On Saturday, April 25, 2020 at 7:41:56 AM UTC+2, David A. Wheeler wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 03:33:42 -0700 (PDT), Thomas Brendan Leahy <
> [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: 
> > I've deleted the proof itself, but to give you an idea, here's an HTML 
> file 
> > I made. 
> ... 
>
> I'm trying to recover your proof of aacllem. Even after a few renames 
> I can't *quite* make it work in mmj2. 
>
> Below is the proof in mmj2 format. 
> mmj2 is reporting the following: 
> E-PA-0410 Theorem aacllem: Step 85: Unification failure in derivation 
> proof step frlmgsum. The step's formula and/or its hypotheses could not be 
> reconciled with the referenced Assertion. Try the Unify/Step Selector 
> Search to find unifiable assertions for the step. 
>
> Suggestions? It's probably a tiny problem. 
>
> --- David A. Wheeler 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/ea114f6a-2e55-4bdb-b716-54fa2ce03aa7%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to