Actually it seems NASA has debunked it and they parachutists themselves admit it is a stone from the parachute, which I said from moment one.
Michael Farmer Sent from my iPad > On Apr 9, 2014, at 3:20 PM, Chris Peterson <c...@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote: > > I'd like to point out that the meteorite explanation has not been "debunked", > nor has it been proven that it was a rock from the parachute. > > The falling object is still consistent with a meteorite. What's been > demonstrated is that the rock is very plausibly explained as something > trapped in the parachute, and given the odds against capturing an image of a > falling meteorite, that's by far the most likely possibility. But a meteorite > remains a possibility, although not a likely one. > > Chris > > ******************************* > Chris L Peterson > Cloudbait Observatory > http://www.cloudbait.com > >> On 4/9/2014 4:04 PM, Michael Farmer wrote: >> So now that the parachute scam has been debunked and now proven to be a rock >> from the parachute, why has the list gone silent on it? > > ______________________________________________ > > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
