Hello All Dave wrote; " I`ve talked to two notable and well respected list members about this and one says he found it listed as a CO3.2 and the other found it listed as a CO3.4. "
Easy solution, Split the difference and call it a CO3.3 Thanks, Tom The proudest member of the IMCA 6168 ----- Original Message ----- From: Dave Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:12 PM Subject: [meteorite-list] Felix... CO3.2 or CO3.4??????? > Greetings Listees. I have this nice piece of Felix > in my collection that I purchased a few years back, > and with the receipt it was classified as a CO3.4, but > I looked it up in the book "Meteorites from A to Z" > which is a marvelous reference book that I use alot, > and it says it is classified as a CO3.2. I`ve talked > to two notable and well respected list members about > this and one says he found it listed as a CO3.2 and > the other found it listed as a CO3.4. Is there some > kind of conflict with this particular meteorite in its > classification, or just a couple of misprints? Thanks > for your help in advance!!! > Dave IMCA #2725 > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). > http://calendar.yahoo.com > > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
