Thanks, Jeff, for the clarification. But, now starts a new problem. How to get the other databases updated?
Typically, to get the Catalogue of Meteorites revised, all Monica Grady needs is a paper which she can reference in her database. Sometimes this is preceded by an entry in the Meteoritical Bulletin, such as, Felix (CO3.4) reclassification. So, Jeff, is there a published paper that we can use as a reference, or will this URL <http://www.pairlist.net/pipermail/meteorite-list/2003-June/024140.html> of your post to this List suffice for Monica? Bob V. ----------------- Original Message ------------------- meteorite-list] Felix... CO3.2 or CO3.4??????? Jeff Grossman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:38:01 -0400 No way Felix is 3.2. Jones and Scott (1990) had it at 3.2, but more recent data show it to be significantly higher. Kainsaz is a solid 3.2, and all properties of Felix show it to be more equilibrated than Kainsaz. Data on TL (Sears) and on amoeboid olivine inclusions (Chizmadia) show Felix to be more like 3.3-3.4. My own studies of matrix in CO's support 3.4 for Felix. So, call it 3.3/3.4. jeff __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
