Hmmm Mark, Both sides are right in my opinion. It's the well known dilemma with that NWA lottery.
I think les Hupes did well on the behalf of their clients to verify each and every stone. Especially with that precious planetary material there is no better way and it's very important to grant the authenticity, because it is everything else than sufficient, if the Moroccains told: It's found in the same area, it's looking quite same, so it will be the same stuff. The other side of the coin is, that if each and every stone of the same material then gets his own NWA-number, we have an inflation of finds listed as own meteorites although it is most probably the same material, which makes it later difficult to group them together again and to avoid f.e. redundant scientific work (at least I think so..) In my imagination the tkw may be the most uninteresting aspect of a meteorite for a scientist, but on the other hand a price factor in selling, so that, if I would find a 10kg-chunk of Moon, I would be tempted to take out the sledge to produce some pairings... So Greg is right with his opus moderandi, as he provides maximum certitude to his collectors and the others are right too as we already have a large NWA-number salad. Take a look on the list of lunaites (without the new Moon now). I count 51 desert numbers, which probably belongs only to 17-18 different falls. And 31 Marses of perhaps 14 pairing groups. What a mess! Cheers! Martin ----- Original Message ----- From: "MARK BOSTICK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 2:03 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA 1110 issues > Hello Adam and list, > > Adam wrote "What you are doing is nothing short of fraud."....."Nelson's > pieces are paired to NWA 1068. NWA 1110 is also paired to NWA 1068, as > well. Pairing to a pairing is ridiculous, submit your own type sample, > claim the extra weight and get your own number." > > Fraud? For selling the same meteorite under the same name? > > Adam you should take this weekly act of yours on the road. I can remember a > couple months ago when you complained that Farmer was using the name Amgala, > and if someone wants to look through the archives, they can find you > complaining about people using multiple numbers on the same meteorite. > > I think you will find it hard to convince us that the same > meteorite.....should have a different name or number from every dealer, and > that to do underwise is "fraud". In my humble opinion, the same > meteorite....is well, the same meteorite. And while I know it soulds a > little funny, us calling the same meteorite, the same name, I really do > think it could work. > > Mark Bostick > www.meteoritearticles.com > > > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
