Hi list, I read again the posts and links about that sensational discovery of young chondrules and the subsequent revolution for the theory of the formation of the solar system, but I have the problem, that nowhere the ages are given - did I miss them?
Bernhard sent me the abstract of the article in Nature, there I find the ages in billions of years: CAIs: 4,567.2 +/- 0.7 Myr Gujba: 4,562.7 +/- 0.5 Myr HaH 237: 4,562.8 +- 0.9 Myr Further it says, that the process of chondrule formation lasted "about" 3 Myr and "shortly" started "after that of" the CAIs. If you then additionally add the given error margins of their values, then the stuff was built at the same time, as other chondrules too! That would be not remarkable or did I miss some figures? Buckleboo Martin ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
