First visit: http://www.meteoritt.no/meteor.jpg
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Göran Axelsson Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. Juli 2006 01:08 An: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Norwegian meteorite classification guessing game Matson, Robert wrote: > Hi All, > > Is someone keeping track of all the guesses for the classification > of the new Norwegian fall? ;-) I guess I can go back through the > archives and collect them all. > > Based purely on statistics of falls, I'd be disinclined to join the > chorus and pick carbonaceous chondrite. An ordinary chondrite is > far more probable. That said, this doesn't much look like an H- > or L-chondrite. But equilibrated LL works for me. > > If I had to pick a carbonaceous type, I would rule out CB, CH, CI, > CM, CV and CR. That leaves only CO and CK, and it looks more like > a CK to my eye than CO. CKs are also very paramagnetic. --Rob > Paramagnetic? Are you shure you don't mean ferromagnetic? Paramagnetic is a very weak form of magnetic attraction, for example aluminium which is a strong paramagnetic material. The type of magnetism displayed by iron and nickel is called ferromagnetic. I'm not trying to bring back the old magnetic discussion again, just commenting on a detail. I'm trying to decide if I will go to Norway or not, I have some things to do but I could go there in a few days. I will probably go in the end, a fall this close isn't happening too often but I have other things to do... In any case, this is interesting. :-) /Göran ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list