Stan,
I would be happy to let this debate end here and now. All I ask is not to
mention my last name out of context in a public auction, we have discussed
this before. You have the right to run your auctions any way you want but if
I see unofficial pairing statements to material I am involved with, I will
take exception to it, sometimes publicly since our investment in time and
energy is great and I do not believe in free rides.
Adam
.
----- Original Message -----
From: "stan ." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 1:12 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] [ebay] ending in about 2 days
Stan,
Just admit you are telling fibs. You say that Aaronson and others say the
stones look the same. That's funny, Aaronson and Boswell have never seen
NWA 2999! You know what happened when Farrell changed the NWA 2999
abstract to match his sample. It is simple, get your facts straight!
Adam
Adam,
If you say Greg did not get nwa 2999 from Adam Aaronson I will take your
word and admit to being mistaken specifically regarding the origin of nwa
2999. Aaronson HAS seen nwa 3164 - a pairing to nwa 2999 per the metbull
website - and would be happy to tell you it's the same stuff as my
provisional nwa 2934. I dont know what Boswell has to say about this
material as i dont know the guy, and have never made any claims to his
opinion on the matter.
are all clear now?
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
