Hi Mike-
Being _highly_ skeptical that the Carancas event was hypervelocity or
crater forming was an entirely appropriate attitude during the first
days. After all, not a year goes by that we don't get stories out of
usually backwater places about fiery meteorites, destroyed homes, and
craters. How often do these stories actually pan out? Once. It is
precisely because Carancas appears to be unique that it is generating so
much interest amongst meteor (and to a lesser extent, meteorite)
researchers.
It is also important to consider that there is no sharp distinction
between a "crater" and an "impact pit". Personally, I consider the
presence of shock structures to push this into the "crater" category,
but even so, identifying that evidence took several months.
Chris
*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Farmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Adam Hupe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Adam"
<meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 9:04 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Carancas crater
At least the fact that Carancas is a meteorite crater
is resolved. I recall you refusing to accept that it
was a crater.
______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
