Hey Mike, Jason, List,

The term "very low" when referring to magnetism in a stone meteorite is "very subjective" isn't it? Is there a scale to go by, or industry standard for strength of magnetism? I've had stone material that a super strong and very large neo magnet would barely stick to.

Also wouldn't small slices such as this piece and others be hard to determine types due to the small mass. I mean, a small 10 gram stone wouldn't be completely representative of an entire mass if that mass is unknown would it? I've seen and cut some chondrites with dual lithologies but if I cut those stones in half down the separation line of the mineral types, how would you know what type it is?

Regards,
Eric



Jason Utas wrote:
Hola,
Check out the last picture - there's a white chondrule clearly visible
in the upper right/center of the photo.
Also note the dark chondrule (large, but fuzzy) at the bottom edge of
the slice, a tad to the left of center.
I'd go with LL6; it has a few chondrules, and from what I understand,
the type seven designation is reserved for primitive achondrites.  Of
course, it's hard to gauge L vs LL, but you did say that the magnetism
was "very low."
Regards,
Jason

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Galactic Stone &
Ironworks<meteoritem...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Listees!

I'd like some opinions on a meteorite I cut open yesterday.  It's an
oddball I've had in my box of NWA for some time - awaiting a date with
the saw.  It exhibits a very low magnetism and it has a grey matrix
almost entirely devoid of chondrules - although there does appear to
be some remnant chondrule structures.  I'm hoping it might be some
kind of achondrite, but the magnetism mostly rules that out.  Is it
some uncommon type like an L7?  Or is it just something common that I
have not seen before?

The exterior has a wind polished desert varnish on it and there
doesn't appear to be any fusion crust to speak of - although there are
a few scattered tiny patches of black on it.  The stone weighs 16
grams.  I only made 2 cuts - I cut one corner off to expose the matrix
(endcut) and I made one thin slice.   The rest of the stone is intact.

Here are some photo links -

http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj24/Meteoritethrower/Meteorites/Anomalous/new-odd-cut/odd-new-1.jpg

http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj24/Meteoritethrower/Meteorites/Anomalous/new-odd-cut/odd-new-2.jpg

http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj24/Meteoritethrower/Meteorites/Anomalous/new-odd-cut/odd-new-3.jpg

Any opinions are welcomed.

Best regards,

MikeG

--
.........................................................
Michael Gilmer (Louisiana, USA)
Member of the Meteoritical Society.
Member of the Bayou Region Stargazers Network.
Websites - http://www.galactic-stone.com and http://www.glassthrower.com
..........................................................
______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



--
Regards,
Eric Wichman
Meteorites USA
http://www.meteoritesusa.com
904-236-5394

______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to