It's not really that simple unless I'm missing something. Has Dr. Jambon
studied a piece of NWA 5400? The way I see it is that one scientist is now
studying BOTH meteorites in a comparative study so on conclusion of Dr.
Irving's work he will be able to say with more certainty whether they are
paired or not. In all likelihood they probably are but there's no point
getting into all this again.
Cheers,
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: <cdtuc...@cox.net>
To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>; <toronto...@gmail.com>;
<impact...@aol.com>; <starsinthed...@aol.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA 5363 UNGROUPED OR BRACHNITE
Anne,
I hate to beat a dead horse ......
All due respect here but, am I missing something ?
Yes, Dr. Irving is one of our most brilliant Scientist's we all know that
but, he is not the only one. I repeat. Dr. jambon says it' so. So it's so.
Sorry.
Solong.
Carl
--
Carl or Debbie Esparza
Meteoritemax
---- impact...@aol.com wrote:
Carl,
Yes, I read your email.
Look at the Met. Bulletin, NWA 5363 is still listed as provosional
I am sorry but you will have to wait for Dr. Irving to publish the
results
of the O-Isotopes comparison.
Anne M. Black
_http://www.impactika.com/_ (http://www.impactika.com/)
_impact...@aol.com_ (mailto:impact...@aol.com)
Vice-President, I.M.C.A. Inc.
_http://www.imca.cc/_ (http://www.imca.cc/)
In a message dated 7/24/2010 6:55:39 PM Mountain Daylight Time,
cdtuc...@cox.net writes:
Anne,
Perhaps you did not read my last post (same thread) because I posted an
email in it's entirety from Dr. Jambon. Evidently, The corrections to his
original classification have been made and
In his email he clearly states "NWA 5400 is undoubtedly paired with NWA
5363!".
This leaves NO room for doubt. It is paired and the time for patience has
past.
We now know the whole story. He goes on to say that the Nom. Com and
Science publications. already have this information.
Thank you Dr. Jambon for this great news.
Carl
--
Carl or Debbie Esparza
Meteoritemax
---- impact...@aol.com wrote:
> Kai,
>
> This was discussed at length only 6 weeks ago. Let's not do that again.
>
> The only way it will be known for certain whether those two meteorites
are
> paired, or not, will be after a comparative study of the Oxygen
> Isotopes
is
> done on both meteorites.
> It has been done by Dr. Tony Irving for NWA 5400.
> He has now been supplied with a fragment of NWA 5363.
> And we will have to wait until he is done studying this second one.
>
> Patiently if at all possible!
>
> Anne M. Black
> _http://www.impactika.com/_ (http://www.impactika.com/)
> _impact...@aol.com_ (mailto:impact...@aol.com)
> Vice-President, I.M.C.A. Inc.
> _http://www.imca.cc/_ (http://www.imca.cc/)
>
>
> In a message dated 7/24/2010 4:19:47 PM Mountain Daylight Time,
> toronto...@gmail.com writes:
> Hi Tom,
>
> I am confused by your post. You memtioned that 5363 is 5400 paired.
> But NWA5400 is a brachnite like but not a brachnite due to its
> terrestial osotope. It is a terrestial meteorite or ungrouped. To be a
> brachnite and nwa5400 paired is a contradiction to me. Anyway I cannot
> find the 5363 on meteotitical bulletin.
>
> Just post my thinking for your consideration.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kai
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
