Adam and all,

Help me out in my research here. I'm not able to find the "Collecting rocks for landscaping..." quote in the Code of Federal Regulations at all. However, this is in CFR Title 43, in the BLM section, meaning it has the effect of law.

Sec. 8365.1-5  Property and resources.

    (a) On all public lands, unless otherwise authorized, no person
shall;
    (1) Willfully deface, disturb, remove or destroy any personal
property, or structures, or any scientific, cultural, archaeological or
historic resource, natural object or area;
    (2) Willfully deface, remove or destroy plants or their parts, soil,
rocks or minerals, or cave resources, except as permitted under
paragraph (b) or (c) of this paragraph; or
    (3) Use on the public lands explosive, motorized or mechanical
devices, except metal detectors, to aid in the collection of specimens
permitted under paragraph (b) or (c) of this paragraph.
    (b) Except on developed recreation sites and areas, or where
otherwise prohibited and posted, it is permissible to collect from the
public lands reasonable amounts of the following for noncommercial
purposes:
    (1) Commonly available renewable resources such as flowers, berries,
nuts, seeds, cones and leaves;
    (2) Nonrenewable resources such as rocks, mineral specimens, common
invertebrate fossils and semiprecious gemstones;
    (3) Petrified wood as provided under subpart 3622 of this title;
    (4) Mineral materials as provided under subpart 3604; and
    (5) Forest products for use in campfires on the public lands. Other
collection of forest products shall be in accordance with the provisions
of Group 5500 of this title.
    (c) The collection of renewable or nonrenewable resources from the
public lands for sale or barter to commercial dealers may be done only
after obtaining a contract or permit from an authorized officer in
accordance with part 3600 or 5400 of this chapter.

[48 FR 36384, Aug. 10, 1983; 67 FR 68778, Nov. 13, 2002]

I would say that meteorites are covered under section (a)(1) as objects/resources of scientific interest. It seems possible to me that Adam's quotation derives from a BLM attempt to define "reasonable amounts" of rocks under (b)(2). But I would argue that this section doesn't apply to meteorites at all due to their coverage under (a)(1).

I am an amateur at reading laws and regs. Somebody correct me if I am wrong.

Jeff


On 2010-11-04 7:35 PM, Adam Hupe wrote:
And being that it is federal public land, we have the right to remove 250 lbs of
rocks a year without a permit. Anything that hinders this right goes against the
laws our legislators set forth.  Requiring a permit in Washinton and Oregon is a
clear design on our liberty.

***********************************************************************************


Collecting Limits
Collecting rocks for landscaping and other  personal uses is allowed without a
permit, as long as the use is non  commercial and no mechanized equipment is
used (other than a car or  pickup truck). A permit is not needed if you limit
your collecting 25  pounds plus one piece per day, not to exceed 250 pounds in
one calendar  year, and no specimen greater than 250 pounds may be collected
without a  special permit. The material must be for personal use only and shall

not be sold or bartered to commercial dealers. Taking rock from  stockpiles is
not allowed.
**********************************************************************************



Link to BLM Site:
http://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/fo/elcentro/recreation/rocks.html


Happy hunting while you still can,

Adam







----- Original Message ----
From: Jeff Grossman<jgross...@usgs.gov>
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Thu, November 4, 2010 4:24:11 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Secret BLM maps

Although I agree that an outright ban on meteorite collecting is not the
best policy, I fail to see what rights you think are being violated.
Are you saying that people have a constitutional right to do anything
and everything they want on federal lands without regulation?  I don't
think this is a civil rights issue; it is a public land-use policy issue.

Jeff

On 2010-11-04 7:05 PM, Adam Hupe wrote:
I agree that these heritage sites should be protected.  My only concern is how
BLM field agents convey information.  They are public servants and should tell
the truth.  If they do not know the laws, then they should simply state this
instead of making things up.  I get a different message from every one I have
talked to in regards to meteorite hunting.  Washington and Oregon are now
definitely off limits and there are no permits for meteorite hunting
available.
This is a simple way to violet somebodies rights; Tell them they need a permit
and then don't issue any.

This is a sore subject for me since I can no longer search on public lands in
my
ex-state of Washington Thus never achieving a goal I set.  Meteorites are now
considered treasure and will be protected as such in some areas.




Best Regards,

Adam
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list




--
Dr. Jeffrey N. Grossman       phone: (703) 648-6184
US Geological Survey          fax:   (703) 648-6383
954 National Center
Reston, VA 20192, USA


______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to