Did it successfully complete WGLC? With sufficient support for taking the
document forward? If yes, the chairs can either send it immediately to me as a
WG output.
Or I can AD sponsor it later. The offer to AD sponsor is also valid for other
documents. They need to be in reasonable shape, naturally.
Jari
On 31.10.2011 19:08, Ryuji Wakikawa wrote:
Jari
Thanks for this update. I want to clarify plan of the existing activity, HA
reliability doc, in MEXT.
This document completed WGLC and went nowhere after all.
It supposes to be proposed standard RFC.
Do you want to finish this work with AD sponsor? or just trash it?
thanks
ryuji
On 2011/10/28, at 5:08, Jari Arkko wrote:
All,
We are making some changes to the working group. While we have successfully published a
large number of specifications in recent years, recently it has been difficult to make
progress in the group. The chairs and ADs have looked at the situation and we believe we
need a new focus and a bit of new organization as well. We are terminating the working
group and moving the one remaining active work item to a new working group, the
"DMM" working group. Here's what is going to happen:
o Jouni Korhonen and Julien Laganier will become the chairs of the group.
o The group will meet in Taipei (there is a MEXT slot in the agenda).
o The charter of the group will be changed to focus only on the distributed
mobility effort. We should discuss the details of this charter change both on
the list and in the meeting. The meeting agenda should reserve some time both
for technical discussions as well as the charter discussion.
o Once the discussion on the list and in the meeting has finished, we will rename the
group to "DMM" and put the new charter in effect.
o If there are any other specifications that people would like to publish
beyond the distributed mobility work, we can offer to AD sponsor them to RFCs
outside the new working group. If there is some significant new activity, we
can create new working groups for that.
Comments and feedback and/or alternate suggestions on this plan are welcome.
We would like to thank Marcelo for your many years of service in MEXT. We could
not have completed all the work we did without your energy and push for high
quality results. We would also like to thank Jouni for taking on this new
challenge, and Julien for continuing the work in this space.
Jari and Ralph
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
