Jari, I don't see any objection during WGLC. In fact, we had thoughtful reviews and improved the document. I am fine either AD-sponsor or regular WG procedure, but I need to see progress. WGLC was ended at Aug 1.
thanks ryuji On 2011/10/31, at 12:58, Jari Arkko wrote: > Did it successfully complete WGLC? With sufficient support for taking the > document forward? If yes, the chairs can either send it immediately to me as > a WG output. > > Or I can AD sponsor it later. The offer to AD sponsor is also valid for other > documents. They need to be in reasonable shape, naturally. > > Jari > > On 31.10.2011 19:08, Ryuji Wakikawa wrote: >> Jari >> >> Thanks for this update. I want to clarify plan of the existing activity, HA >> reliability doc, in MEXT. >> This document completed WGLC and went nowhere after all. >> It supposes to be proposed standard RFC. >> Do you want to finish this work with AD sponsor? or just trash it? >> >> thanks >> ryuji >> >> On 2011/10/28, at 5:08, Jari Arkko wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> We are making some changes to the working group. While we have successfully >>> published a large number of specifications in recent years, recently it has >>> been difficult to make progress in the group. The chairs and ADs have >>> looked at the situation and we believe we need a new focus and a bit of new >>> organization as well. We are terminating the working group and moving the >>> one remaining active work item to a new working group, the "DMM" working >>> group. Here's what is going to happen: >>> >>> o Jouni Korhonen and Julien Laganier will become the chairs of the group. >>> >>> o The group will meet in Taipei (there is a MEXT slot in the agenda). >>> >>> o The charter of the group will be changed to focus only on the >>> distributed mobility effort. We should discuss the details of this charter >>> change both on the list and in the meeting. The meeting agenda should >>> reserve some time both for technical discussions as well as the charter >>> discussion. >>> >>> o Once the discussion on the list and in the meeting has finished, we will >>> rename the group to "DMM" and put the new charter in effect. >>> >>> o If there are any other specifications that people would like to publish >>> beyond the distributed mobility work, we can offer to AD sponsor them to >>> RFCs outside the new working group. If there is some significant new >>> activity, we can create new working groups for that. >>> >>> Comments and feedback and/or alternate suggestions on this plan are welcome. >>> >>> We would like to thank Marcelo for your many years of service in MEXT. We >>> could not have completed all the work we did without your energy and push >>> for high quality results. We would also like to thank Jouni for taking on >>> this new challenge, and Julien for continuing the work in this space. >>> >>> Jari and Ralph >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MEXT mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext >> > _______________________________________________ MEXT mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
