Hello Raj,
Not disagreeing that a BOF would be useful, but
I'm wondering whether the requirements as laid out
in the expired Internet Draft would fit in a single
working group. The distinction between IP-based
and C2C-CC-based applications would probably need
a very contentious BOF, just on that single issue.
There have been so many failed proposals to replace
TCP, that it's hard to avoid skepticism for this one.
Anyway, I'd have more confidence that a BOF which was
restricted to just the mobility part of the problem
might get some useful results.
Regards,
Charlie P.
On 11/7/2011 12:06 PM, [email protected] wrote:
On 11/7/11 9:52 AM, "ext [email protected]"<[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi all,
I agree with Alex and Thierry on this issue!
Where is the best place at the IETF to discuss and work out automotive
requirements?
Maybe it would be worthwhile to organize a BoF and consider the potential
for a separate WG since the automotive requirements are not just mobility
related.
-Raj
Best regards,
Georgios
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Thierry Ernst
Sent: maandag 7 november 2011 14:17
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item
Thanks Alex for raising this.
My view on this is that the automotive industry has some needs that are
partly related to NEMO RO, but not only related to NEMO.
So, I would like to seek advice from our AD about where would be the
best
place at the IETF to discuss automotive requirements related to IPv6 ?
Regarding the dratf itself, it is our intention to update it.
Regards,
Thierry
On 07/11/11 14:06, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
Hello Jari, WG members,
Le 28/10/2011 14:08, Jari Arkko a écrit :
All,
We are making some changes to the working group. While we have
successfully published a large number of specifications in recent
years, recently it has been difficult to make progress in the group.
The chairs and ADs have looked at the situation and we believe we
need a new focus and a bit of new organization as well. We are
terminating the working group and moving the one remaining active
work item to a new working group, the "DMM" working group. Here's
what is going to happen:
o Jouni Korhonen and Julien Laganier will become the chairs of the
group.
o The group will meet in Taipei (there is a MEXT slot in the agenda).
o The charter of the group will be changed to focus only on the
distributed mobility effort. We should discuss the details of this
charter change both on the list and in the meeting. The meeting
agenda should reserve some time both for technical discussions as
well as the charter discussion.
o Once the discussion on the list and in the meeting has finished, we
will rename the group to "DMM" and put the new charter in effect.
o If there are any other specifications that people would like to
publish beyond the distributed mobility work, we can offer to AD
sponsor them to RFCs outside the new working group.
I wonder what is the plan about
draft-ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req-02? "Automotive Industry
Requirements for NEMO Route Optimization"
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req-02
I can see a number of options to move it forward, like for example:
- change in authorship, title.
- continue as part of new Charter (fulfill earlier objectives) or
sponsor separately per your offer.
- change in focus.
What do you think?
Alex
If there is some significant new activity, we can create new working
groups for that.
Comments and feedback and/or alternate suggestions on this plan are
welcome.
We would like to thank Marcelo for your many years of service in
MEXT. We could not have completed all the work we did without your
energy and push for high quality results. We would also like to thank
Jouni for taking on this new challenge, and Julien for continuing the
work in this space.
Jari and Ralph
_______________________________________________ MEXT
mailing list
[email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
