Hi all, I agree with Alex and Thierry on this issue! Where is the best place at the IETF to discuss and work out automotive requirements?
Best regards, Georgios > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Thierry Ernst > Sent: maandag 7 november 2011 14:17 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item > > > Thanks Alex for raising this. > > My view on this is that the automotive industry has some needs that are > partly related to NEMO RO, but not only related to NEMO. > > So, I would like to seek advice from our AD about where would be the best > place at the IETF to discuss automotive requirements related to IPv6 ? > > Regarding the dratf itself, it is our intention to update it. > > Regards, > Thierry > > > > > > > On 07/11/11 14:06, Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > > Hello Jari, WG members, > > > > > > Le 28/10/2011 14:08, Jari Arkko a écrit : > >> All, > >> > >> We are making some changes to the working group. While we have > >> successfully published a large number of specifications in recent > >> years, recently it has been difficult to make progress in the group. > >> The chairs and ADs have looked at the situation and we believe we > >> need a new focus and a bit of new organization as well. We are > >> terminating the working group and moving the one remaining active > >> work item to a new working group, the "DMM" working group. Here's > >> what is going to happen: > >> > >> o Jouni Korhonen and Julien Laganier will become the chairs of the > >> group. > >> > >> o The group will meet in Taipei (there is a MEXT slot in the agenda). > >> > >> o The charter of the group will be changed to focus only on the > >> distributed mobility effort. We should discuss the details of this > >> charter change both on the list and in the meeting. The meeting > >> agenda should reserve some time both for technical discussions as > >> well as the charter discussion. > >> > >> o Once the discussion on the list and in the meeting has finished, we > >> will rename the group to "DMM" and put the new charter in effect. > >> > >> o If there are any other specifications that people would like to > >> publish beyond the distributed mobility work, we can offer to AD > >> sponsor them to RFCs outside the new working group. > > > > I wonder what is the plan about > > draft-ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req-02? "Automotive Industry > > Requirements for NEMO Route Optimization" > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req-02 > > > > I can see a number of options to move it forward, like for example: > > - change in authorship, title. > > - continue as part of new Charter (fulfill earlier objectives) or > > sponsor separately per your offer. > > - change in focus. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Alex > > > >> If there is some significant new activity, we can create new working > >> groups for that. > > > > > >> > >> Comments and feedback and/or alternate suggestions on this plan are > >> welcome. > >> > >> We would like to thank Marcelo for your many years of service in > >> MEXT. We could not have completed all the work we did without your > >> energy and push for high quality results. We would also like to thank > >> Jouni for taking on this new challenge, and Julien for continuing the > >> work in this space. > >> > >> Jari and Ralph > >> > >> _______________________________________________ MEXT > mailing list > >> [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > MEXT mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext _______________________________________________ MEXT mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
