On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 04:12 +0000, Frank D wrote:
> 
> -
> >  
> 
> If I understand you right, you want to recieve mail on one of the machines? 
> Or are they going outside of your network? I'm pretty sure you don't even 
> need a MTA (mail transfer agent, ie sendmail) with smartd, etc. if it's going 
> to another machine. Though I've never had a machine without an MTA, or looked 
> to see exactly how they send mail.. so I couldn't say for certain.
> 
> 
> Frank DiMitri

Frank, it looks like you're correct. I happened to be reading today an
article called "Pernicious Ports"
http://www.berghel.net/col-edit/digital_village/dec-05/dv_12-05.php

===========================================================================================================================================================

(2)  Unix-Centric

Most UNIX systems, regardless of brand, offer SMTP mail services through
TCP port 25. If the system is not actually a mail relay or server, then
you likely do not need this service running at all. The main exposure
lies in the failure to continuously patch the system. By the way, it is
a common misconception that an SMTP server must be running for a local
user or service to send email out of a UNIX box. This is simply not
true. The recommended solution is to block TCP 25 at the firewall.

==============================================================================================================================================================

Could someone possibly explain how email works without an SMTP server
and/or how the "common misconception" arose?

_______________________________________________
Mid-Hudson Valley Linux Users Group                  http://mhvlug.org
http://mhvlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mhvlug

Upcoming Meetings (6pm - 8pm)                         MHVLS Auditorium
  Nov 3 - Open Source Hardware: Bugs, Beagles and Beyond
  Dec 1 - IBM's Open Client Deployment
  Jan 5 - Building a Comunity Site with Drupal

Reply via email to