You didn't bring up this topic? Trying to use science to slam homosexuality is like Rummy explain why he had his head up his ass:
Now what is the message there? The message is that there are no "knowns." There are thing we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. So when we do the best we can and we pull all this information together, and we then say well that's basically what we see as the situation, that is really only the known knowns and the known unknowns. And each year, we discover a few more of those unknown unknowns. It sounds like a riddle. It isn't a riddle. It is a very serious, important matter. ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 3:08:44 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Fwd: Gay Marraige I did not bring up this topic. But thanks for your input. Jim in Tucson From: [email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected] Sent: 9/26/2009 2:55:48 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time Subj: Re: Gay Marraige Seriously? This is not the forum for such a debate. I respectfully disagree with your views and hope my worshiping a flying spagetti monster doesn't offend you like those pesky equal right seeking homos do..... Pat On 9/26/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please choose your words wisely on this subject, as there are many > thinking people who are not pro-homosexual based upon sound science and a > belief > in evolution. > Homosexuality runs counter to evolution. Evolution would suppose that life > would gravitate to those life forms with the highest rate of reproduction, > and, consequently the highest survival rates. Therefore, homosexuality can > only be explained by evolution as an unnatural anomaly. > For example, take a baby born with a third leg. Evolution would point out > that bipeds are more advanced than quadrupeds. Therefore, a baby born with > a third leg is unnatural, not the next progression in natural evolution. > As another example, take a person born blind. Our society goes to great > lengths and great expense to educate and integrate site impaired persons > into > our society. However, I have not seen great rallies of blind persons > attempting to convince the rest of us that their blindness is natural. > And of course using biology, physiology, and anatomy would readily and > easily expose the absence of reproduction capability, as well as the > absence > of proper copulation equipment in homosexual relationships. > Please rest assured that I am not some rabid homophobic. As long as no one > is harmed, people should be free to do whatever they want in the privacy > of their own home. However, that is not what most LGBT proponents want. > They > want their chosen lifestyle to be elevated and to be considered equal to a > lifestyle that is in fact supported by science and evolution. > Jim in Tucson > > -- Sent from my mobile device _______________________________________________ Miatapower mailing list [email protected] http://list.miatapower.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/miatapower _______________________________________________ Miatapower mailing list [email protected] http://list.miatapower.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/miatapower
_______________________________________________ Miatapower mailing list [email protected] http://list.miatapower.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/miatapower
