Ummmm - actually it's very natural, and actually evolutionarily beneficial since it allow the absolute best chance for reproductive success. The real question is why don't more animals do it? For only one article see below
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090203110326.htm _____ From: Dan Scolnick [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 10:01 AM To: Jim Wilson; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: Gay Marraige (NMC) _____ From: Jim Wilson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:51 AM To: Dan Scolnick; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: Gay Marraige (NMC) Personally I think it's responsible to wear latex while you're wearing leather ;-) BTW - what about the animals that are born one sex and change to another.or are born with no gender but change to one or the other - and then sometimes back to the other CLEARLY, THAT'S NOT NATURAL. but neither are most of the foods corporate america has us eating. dan _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dan Scolnick Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 11:47 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: Gay Marraige Homosexual acts are found in the entire animal kingdom - out in nature. Therefore clearly NOT unnatural. In fact the construct that homosexual acts are somehow even remarkable is an artificial construct that has emerged in the last 50 - 60 years. Just like a household consists of a mom, dad and kids. Households used to be very extended, not the 1950's june cleaver style household that we somehow think is "natural" today. If you want to consider it an anomaly by percentage, then blacks and Hispanics and jews and catholics are all anomolies in the USA, as are white men on the planet earth. If you want to get Jesuit/biblical about it, homosexuality is defined as an "abomination". Sounds awful doesn't it? But wearing a mixture of textiles, like cotton and wool at the same time is also considered an "abomination". Not so bad, unless of course you're wearing polyester along with the cotton and wool (and leather? Latex?), that I would consider an abomination. Dan _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 7:19 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: Gay Marraige In a message dated 9/26/2009 5:39:24 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] writes: On Sep 26, 2009, at 2:39 PM, SOMEONE ELSE wrote: "Homosexuality runs counter to evolution. Evolution would suppose that life would gravitate to those life forms with the highest rate of reproduction, and, consequently the highest survival rates. Therefore, homosexuality can only be explained by evolution as an unnatural anomaly." Note I I did NOT write the above paragrah, but I DID write the paragraph below as a response: No, It is not counter to evolution, but it is an anomaly, just like that third leg or a one-eyed baby would be an anomaly. Things happen in biochemistry that affect the brain, the body, and one's DNA. This doesn't mean that we should choose to discard people because of an error in their biochemical or DNA make-up, not does it mean that we are at liberty to discriminate against them and prevent them from enjoying the same legal rights as those considered among the norm. Jerry aka LGO
_______________________________________________ Miatapower mailing list [email protected] http://list.miatapower.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/miatapower
