On Mar 4, 2006, at 5:57 PM, Alf Eaton wrote:
On 04 Mar 2006, at 13:50, Ryan King wrote:
On Mar 4, 2006, at 9:31 AM, Alf Eaton wrote:
At postgenomic.com (an aggregator/analysis engine for life
science weblogs), an attempt to get people to add markup to their
posts to identify reviews of papers currently looks like this:
<http://www.postgenomic.com/about_reviews.php>. The
recommendation is to use either a) rev="review" on the outward
link, or b) to enclose the review in <div class="hreview"> and
add class="url" to the outgoing link. My question is that in the
hReview draft specification, 'item' is required: would it be best
to use <div class="hreview item description"> for the wrapper, or
are 'item' and 'description' not really necessary in this context
(where there's not always structure, such as citation metadata,
in the review itself)?
In this case, the url would be the item being reviewed, no?
Yes, it would. The trouble is that the item (title, url) and
description (the text of the review) are all going to be jumbled up
here, so it's difficult to isolate them into separate 'item' and
'description' sections. Could it be implicit that a 'url' class
inside an 'hreview' class refers to the item being reviewed?
Sorry for the slow reply...
It seems that your question is "what do I do when the item's in the
description?".
If I understand that correctly then, there really is no problem, its
perfectly legal to have the item inside the description. So, your
example from http://www.postgenomic.com/about_reviews.php could be:
<div class="hreview">
<p class="description">
I read an <a class="item url" href="[URL of paper]">interesting
paper in Science</a> today...
</p>
</div>
-ryan
--
Ryan King
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
