On 3/30/06, Bruce D'Arcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/30/06, Tim White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Although, to clarify, your distinction above is really between an > in-text citation, and a full bibliographic reference.
Um... I just see it as a note pointing to a citation and the citation itself. That fuller citation is still just an external reference, not a full bibliographic record. i.e. you still don't want price, keywords, etc., or even need the ISBN, technically. He's talking about the book as external to the content at hand, which is his blog entry... it's not the book itself. (Not that I would discourage use of formal identifiers where they exist.) _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
