On Jul 19, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Scott
Reynen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Then Consider providing multiple translations of one price in
different amounts...
How does considering this help us define the currency of the prices
presented? It looks like we just strayed from marking up currency to
marking up exchange rates.
Working out values in secondary currencies is a (real-time or
daily) job
for server-side scripting or user agents, surely?
Sure, but that doesn't make it the same problem. If we don't stick
to a specific problem, we risk never solving anything as the goal
continuously changes. Case in point:
On Jul 19, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Michael Leikam wrote:
If enabling exchange rate and value-over-time calculations
is a goal for a currency uf, I think we'll find them
essential.
None of the examples or brainstorming on the wiki so far seem to
involve exchange rates nor value-over-time. That appears to be a
separate, more complicated problem that can and should be considered
after a currency microformat is complete, not before.
Peace,
Scott
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
