On 12/12/06 10:40 AM, "S. Sriram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> What ufs(.org) has done is bring about a new category i.e. microformats
> into the collective mindspace, similar to Palm computers.
>
> Without a brand name to go with the category microformats,
> What will happen, is the Darwinian like splintering of categories into sub
> categories as in iPod, Zune, BlackBerry etc.

The term nor site microformats(.org) did not bring about a new category.

The category pre-existed: semantic (X)HTML.

"microformats" is the specific "brand" (your term) of semantic (X)HTML that
follows the microformats principles and process.

You could say that RDFa is another "brand" of semantic (X)HTML that follows
its own principles.

Tantek

_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

Reply via email to