Hello Andy,

On 12/30/06, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Charles
Iliya Krempeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes

>In the spec, it mentions the HTTP "X-Pavatar" header...  Did you
>consider at all using the HTTP "Link" header instead?  As in...
>
>Link: <http://example.com/pic.png>; rel="pavatar"

ITYM:

        <link href="http://example.com/pic.png"; rel="pavatar">

No, I meant the HTTP "Link" header.

There is an HTTP "Link" header which "means the same" as the HTML
<link> element.

Refer to section 19.6.2.4 of RFC 2068 for more information about it.

See ya


--
   Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.

   charles @ reptile.ca
   supercanadian @ gmail.com

   developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

Reply via email to