Hello Andy,
On 12/30/06, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Charles
Iliya Krempeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>In the spec, it mentions the HTTP "X-Pavatar" header... Did you
>consider at all using the HTTP "Link" header instead? As in...
>
>Link: <http://example.com/pic.png>; rel="pavatar"
ITYM:
<link href="http://example.com/pic.png" rel="pavatar">
No, I meant the HTTP "Link" header.
There is an HTTP "Link" header which "means the same" as the HTML
<link> element.
Refer to section 19.6.2.4 of RFC 2068 for more information about it.
See ya
--
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
charles @ reptile.ca
supercanadian @ gmail.com
developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss