On 1/1/07, Colin Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 1, 2007, at 5:51 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> I thought tagging was for tagging the current page, not labelling a
> link
> to a second page.
It could be expanded to include links? -- I don't know a whole lot
about it, it was suggested in the discussion I had with someone where
it was pointed out that this is an incorrect use of rel.
I don't believe rel-tag is an incorrect use of 'rel'. @rel="tag"
means that the page being linked to is a tag for the current page.
The linked page should ideally contain a definition of what the tag
means.
Another @rel value that is more similar to the @rel="nsfw" would be
@rel="no-follow", which is trying to express an opinion about the
linked page rather than describing the link relationship.
My own opinion is that a rating is more like an hReview, but the
semantics don't correspond too well.
-Ciaran McNulty
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
