> Thanks for the comments on the margin-marks concept. I 
> sincerely appreciate that.

Credit where credit is due!
 
> I really like the idea of allowing additional control over 
> presentation via pseudo-classes, but I am worried that 
> :target isn't quite right, at least if we follow the spec to 
> the letter 
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/#target-pseudo), 
> specifically since this pseudo-class is not dynamic and there 
> may or may not be a fragment identifier on the microformat.

I have no interpretation of this I'm afraid. I would say that no
solution should break css specs, even ever so slightly. 

Does *adding* to css break spec compliance Eg .vcard:uftarget or
-moz-whatever ?? (if so, scrap everything I said in my previous posts!)

Tony

+++++ The Forestry Commission's computer systems may be monitored and 
communications carried out on them recorded, to secure the effective operation 
of the system and for other lawful purposes. +++++

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure 
Intranet (GSi) virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Cable & Wireless 
in partnership with MessageLabs.

On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus-free
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

Reply via email to