André Luís wrote: > Manu, > the css based approach is somethin that has come up in discussions > about semantics with fellow workers. I believe it does not trash all > of the hard work the communities have don so far.
I never said the discussions "trashed" all of our hard work. I said that some of the discussions "ignore" (some) of the hard work performed by this community as well as the RDFa community. > All it does, from > what i gathered, is move the semantics from html and places it in a > separate file/place. Right - which both this community and the RDFa community are opposed to: 1. We do not want semantics to be placed in separate files. 2. We do not want vocabularies to be re-defined from site to site. 3. We want semantic markup to be easy to author for regular people - CSS is /not/ easy to author. That's what I was attempting to point out with my statement. Apologies if I was not clear :) -- manu _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
