On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 03:47 +0100, Martin McEvoy wrote: > On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 21:08 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote: > > Most of the day today was spent re-analyzing all of the music service > > and podcast websites in audio-info-examples using Microformalyze. The > > raw analysis data is available here: > > > > http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-examples#Microformalyze_Data_Files > > > > The analysis is available here: > > > > http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-examples#Analysis_of_Music_Services > > > > http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-examples#Analysis_of_Music_Podcasts > > > > The new analysis shows very strong support for POSITION. This property > > is displayed in 70.73% of 41 music service websites analyzed and 100% of > > the 8 podcast websites analyzed. > > I found No evidence of Position as far as podcasting is concerned > although all the examples make a reference to episode I am not sure that > this is the same thing, Can I also point out that podcasting Is NOT a > problem area for this discussion. > > However Position Is something that should be supported As far as Music > Downloads are concerned > > +1 for Position > > > > > There is also enough support to meet the 80/20 rule for DESCRIPTION. > > This property is displayed in 39.02% of 41 music service websites > > analyzed and 100% of the 8 podcast websites analyzed. > > +1 for Description > > > > > PROPOSAL: We add POSITION and DESCRIPTION to the hAudio draft since > > there are enough examples to warrant their inclusion into > > the Microformat. > > > > -- manu > > Manu are you also going to REMOVE the Album and Podcast properties and > revert back to *audio-title* until any disputes have been resolved? I do > not think that three votes was enough to warrant any changes to the > existing proposal. > > I think you should have notified all the active participants in hAudio > BEFORE you made any changes to OUR proposition.
Sorry for seeming unreasonable but the additions of Album and Recording really was a bit of a surprise to me and something that wasn't fully discussed Anyway An easy solution The beginning of this conversation was about (in a nutshell) merging certain properties from hAlbum into hAudio right! so why don't we just do that >From hAlbum we reuse both *album-title* http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-album-proposal#Album_Title and *track* http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-album-proposal#Track coupled with new properties *position* and *description* merge all that with the 0.6 version of hAudio and I think we have something that will suit everyone's situation The full property list would be hAudio album-title contributor published rel-sample rel-enclosure rel-payment photo track audio-title duration category price Comments? Thanks Martin > > Thanks > > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > > microformats-new mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
