On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 20:30 +0100, Martin McEvoy wrote: > On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 03:47 +0100, Martin McEvoy wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 21:08 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote: > > > Most of the day today was spent re-analyzing all of the music service > > > and podcast websites in audio-info-examples using Microformalyze. The > > > raw analysis data is available here: > > > > > > http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-examples#Microformalyze_Data_Files > > > > > > The analysis is available here: > > > > > > http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-examples#Analysis_of_Music_Services > > > > > > http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-examples#Analysis_of_Music_Podcasts > > > > > > The new analysis shows very strong support for POSITION. This property > > > is displayed in 70.73% of 41 music service websites analyzed and 100% of > > > the 8 podcast websites analyzed. > > > > I found No evidence of Position as far as podcasting is concerned > > although all the examples make a reference to episode I am not sure that > > this is the same thing, Can I also point out that podcasting Is NOT a > > problem area for this discussion. > > > > However Position Is something that should be supported As far as Music > > Downloads are concerned > > > > +1 for Position > > > > > > > > There is also enough support to meet the 80/20 rule for DESCRIPTION. > > > This property is displayed in 39.02% of 41 music service websites > > > analyzed and 100% of the 8 podcast websites analyzed. > > > > +1 for Description > > > > > > > > PROPOSAL: We add POSITION and DESCRIPTION to the hAudio draft since > > > there are enough examples to warrant their inclusion into > > > the Microformat. > > > > > > -- manu > > > > Manu are you also going to REMOVE the Album and Podcast properties and > > revert back to *audio-title* until any disputes have been resolved? I do > > not think that three votes was enough to warrant any changes to the > > existing proposal. > > > > I think you should have notified all the active participants in hAudio > > BEFORE you made any changes to OUR proposition. > > Sorry for seeming unreasonable but the additions of Album and Recording > really was a bit of a surprise to me and something that wasn't fully > discussed > > Anyway An easy solution The beginning of this conversation was about > (in a nutshell) merging certain properties from hAlbum into hAudio > right! so why don't we just do that > > >From hAlbum we reuse both > > *album-title* > http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-album-proposal#Album_Title > > and > > *track* > http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-album-proposal#Track > > coupled with new properties > > *position* and *description* > > merge all that with the 0.6 version of hAudio and I think we have > something that will suit everyone's situation > > The full property list would be > > hAudio > album-title description > contributor > published > rel-sample > rel-enclosure > rel-payment > photo > track position > audio-title > duration > category > price > > Comments? > > > Thanks > Martin
Sorry, Its been a long weekend :) > > > > > Thanks > > > > Martin > > > _______________________________________________ > > > microformats-new mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
