On the 11th payment of a client fee, the charge does not get applied
--------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: MIFOS-3702
                 URL: http://mifosforge.jira.com/browse/MIFOS-3702
             Project: mifos
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Fee
    Affects Versions: Release 1.6.0
            Reporter: Ryan Whitney
         Attachments: Screen shot 2010-09-14 at 14.12.27.png

SECDEP has two fees that are charged to the clients weekly (MMF1 and MMF2).  
Currently, these fees are charged to the account successfully for the first ten 
payments but on the 11th payment, it just doesn't get applied.  Their 
workaround is to remove the fees and re-apply them, but as they approach the 
11th payment, it again disappears.

You can see the sample on the SECDEP servers.  Look at the attached screenshot 
for client 0003-000014523. 
The date the screenshot was run is 9/14/2010.  The last payment (9) was on 
8/30.  The clients meets on Mondays, so its 10th payment was due on 9/6 and the 
11th on 9/13.  As of the 14th, it only shows that the client is 16 pesos 
overdue, but they should be 32 pesos over due!  Also, if you click on apply 
payment, it only populates with the 16 pesos and not the 32 pesos that need to 
be entered.

SECDEP has founds this to be a consistent behavior for them. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://mifosforge.jira.com/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Mifos-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mifos-issues

Reply via email to