I still prefer a bridge. It allows me to apply bridge filters between
ports easier than the switch does.
On 11/04/2014 08:01 PM, Scott Lambert wrote:
Been a while since you tried it? 6.x has been showing switch traffic
correctly for a while. For me it has in winbox, at least. I've not
checked SNMP lately.
On November 4, 2014 9:26:09 PM CST, Jeff Harms
<[email protected]> wrote:
That's a really good question. The Mikrotik defaults will set it
up to do user master and slave ports, but still has to bridge
between wlan1 and master port so there is still a bridge. That's
not the only reason I don't like using that setup. I like to know
what's going on at a glance; the master slave port setup show all
traffic to the master port. It's like the slave ports are doing
nothing, That doesn't help me know where traffic is coming from
and going to on those switched ports.
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Butch Evans <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 11/03/2014 09:14 AM, Scott Reed wrote:
> Better way is to use the switch chip on ports 2-5 and bridge
the other
> stuff to port 2.
What makes this "better"?
--
Butch Evans
702-537-0979 <tel:702-537-0979>
Network Support and Engineering
http://store.wispgear.net/
http://www.butchevans.com/
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mikrotik-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
